1:

Saturday, June 7, 2008

What The Hell Is Going On?

We are on the cusp of potentially electing our first black president who is calling for a change in America and we now have to deal with death threats to graduates? As my son would say, "WTF?"

In this morning's Capital, it was reported theat Tahzay Brown--the student who was shot in the mall a few years ago received a death threat if he walked across the stage at the Annapolis Senior High School graduation ceremony.

Erring to the side of caution, the Administration prevented him from attending. While I am all for the protection of EVERY citizen, why did we allow the bad guys to win. What about metal detectors and increased security at the ceremony? The threat was apparently about him being publicly graduated and that could have (and should have) been handled. If it was about graduation in concept, why is the Administration going to the additional expense of a "private" ceremony?

I can see the conflict, but it also shows that we have such a long long way to go.

A Charter Or Grant To Park? Elevating the Mayor to The President?

...of St. Johns College, that is. At yesterday's scholarly symposium on the charter of Annapolis at St. Johns College, a noted historian argued that Queen Anne was a sickly, rheumatoid who was bed-ridden while Mayor Ellen "O" Moyer defended the legacy of the namesake of Annapolis. Meanwhile, a St. Johns security guard by the name of a Mr. Boston entered the lobby of Key Auditorium looking for the owner of a Buick mini-SUV that had parked illegally--in the spot reserved for the college's president, Chris Nelson. There was a large white sign saying, "Reserved for President".

Nobody claimed ownership of the car. An envoy was sent into the symposium to find the offender. Alas, it was learned that the car belonged to none other than the mayor of Annapolis. Inside the car was a hang tag with a multi-day pass from our city, and a large paper granting--or was that "chartering" it with permission to park in The Campbell Lot at St. Johns, where it indeed was, but, just not in a permitted space on that lot. The security guard was not amused as he stood by the car, waiting for it to be moved. "She may be the mayor, but she can't park in the president's spot," said Mr. Boston, who was apparently not one of the Sons of Liberty.

One could argue that the mayor could have walked from her spot at City Hall's Hillman Garage, or taken any one of the frequent and free shuttle buses running through town. Considering her fervent environmental views, which CP generally supports--and shares with her, why is she driving the few short blocks to St. Johns? Why does she drive from her waterfront home in Eastport to downtown? Perhaps it is because she can--and because she can park for free--almost anywhere that she wants.

After a few minutes of waiting, the mayor had not yet emerged to move her car. Mr. Boston waited....CP left the scene of the crime...

Friday, June 6, 2008

Amusing Positioning

I just thought these two headlines which appeared on page A3 of the Capital Gazette on June 5, 2008 were amusing. Especially considering they were one after the other:

Risky teen behavior may be on decline

Teens send nude photos by cell phones

(Oh well, tried to find a link but could not!)

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Surely Not All Politicans Are Like This--Are They?

This article was first published by the Orlando Sentinel Star newspaper, and was originally sent to CP by an Eastporter. I found it uncopyrighted online and so reprint it here for your interest. The author is a long-time journalist who is sometimes labeled as being a "paleoconservative".

The 545 People Responsible For All Of U.S. Woes

BY Charley Reese
(Date of publication unknown, but probably in the 1980's)-- -- - Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered why, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, we have deficits? Have you ever wondered why, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The president does. You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does. You and I don't write the tax code. Congress does. You and I don't set fiscal policy. Congress does. You and I don't control monetary policy. The Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one president and nine Supreme Court justices - 545 human beings out of the 235 million - are directly, legally, morally and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered but private central bank.

I excluded all but the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman or a president to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it.

No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislation's responsibility to determine how he votes.

A CONFIDENCE CONSPIRACY

Don't you see how the con game that is played on the people by the politicians? Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of Tip O'Neill, who stood up and criticized Ronald Reagan for creating deficits.

The president can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it. The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating appropriations and taxes.

O'Neill is the speaker of the House. He is the leader of the majority party. He and his fellow Democrats, not the president, can approve any budget they want. If the president vetos it, they can pass it over his veto.

REPLACE SCOUNDRELS

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 235 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts - of incompetence and irresponsibility.

I can't think of a single domestic problem, from an unfair tax code to defense overruns, that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.

When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair. If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red. If the Marines are in Lebanon, it's because they want them in Lebanon.

There are no insoluble government problems. Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take it.

Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exist disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation" or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people and they alone are responsible. They and they alone have the power. They and they alone should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses - provided they have the gumption to manage their own employees.

Let Our Cops Do Their Job


Being a cop is a stressful job. Sometimes a wrong decision is made in an instant. Sometimes a moment of bad judgment comes across us all. There are three officers that are suspended for utilizing a high speed chase to catch an armed teen with a stolen car. An officer was hurt, but there were no fatalities and no bystanders were hurt. They could have been but they weren't. Time to move on.

I am not a cop, but I am sure in the heat of the moment, their reasons were just. There are some thugs that are no longer on the street because they did what we pay them to do.

When was the last time a cop pounced into the County Council Chambers to reprimand Josh Cohen, Jamie Benoit and Daryl Jones for one of their bonehead ideas? There have been many and I am sure more to come!

Reinstate these officers. We are short on cops as it is and when we have more cops pushing pencils and not enough catching the bad guys--well we all know what happens!

Read about this BS in The Capital!

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

Are We On The Right Track?


The evening paper tonight had some encouraging news. A murderer was sentenced to 17 years and a crack addict who maimed his girlfriend was sentenced to 7. Boy this is a far cry from the days when a man can molest his own daughter and get house arrest for a few months! It is a far cry from the would be rapist that gets off because the police tossed away the KY jelly he had in his pocket.

Are the judges beginning to listen? I give kudos to Caroom (who has not been so stern in the past) and Loney for imparting fair and just sentences.

Monday, June 2, 2008

It Is Wrong...It Is So Wrong...

Almost six months ago, on Friday, January 18, I posted a piece titled,"Why Routine Traffic and Parking Violations Are So Serious" in which I discussed supposedly "routine" or "non-moving" traffic violations asserting that people who scoff at traffic and parking laws demonstrate anti-social behavior and a lack of respect for lawfulness--and this is widespread. Police are well aware of how "routine" violations often lead to the discovery of more serious crime. I then took a few items from a recent police crime watch report, complete with details of incidents and the names of drivers charged with violations to illustrate the point. So today, yes almost six months later, someone named "anonymous" sends me the following note, unedited and in its entirety:

"it is wrong to put peoples information on the internet just like that. it is so wrong."

Dear "Anonymous":

it is so wrong to send anonymous letters

it is so wrong to speed through our neighborhoods

it is so wrong to drive without a license

it is so wrong to run through stop signs and red lights

it is so wrong to drive while intoxicated or under the influence of drugs

Shall I go on? As if that is not enough to make my point, identities of people arrested and charged with crimes are a matter of public record. Plain and simple. The information I provided was already published in the city's crime watch reports and therefore was broadcast on 1430WNAV and in The Capital. Besides that, did it ever occur to you
that the ability of the news media to publish such information really protects everybody's rights?

By the way "anonymous," are you one of the people who was arrested for one of those violations? CP

Cellphones, Cellfindulgence, Cellfishness....Cellibacy?

Do you get invited to Facebook, MySpace or Linkedin or other such cyber-networks? All kinds of people link up with these things but don't know their neighbors. Why? Because they are on the computer all the time. Dunnnh!

In response to one of these mediated email invites, I wrote a personal reply to the friend who had it sent through Facebook. It went something like this:


It's nice to hear from you, but I prefer not to mess with any of those web driven contrivances. I'd much prefer an occasional letter or phone call or visit.....but you know how I am in that regard. Hell-except for this invitation to use a moderated and commercial site to mediate communication, any communication between you and me has always been initiated by me--until this one, which, as I say, came mediated.

If you've got room in your life and time to make facebook stuff--and I suppose it serves a useful purpose for many--it just does not interest me, I wish you well with it.

Perhaps when you're thinking of coming east again or you'd like to hook up for real--in person--I may just hear from you. I've developed a rather curmudgeonly personal philosophy about communication in the modern world. Let me tell you..I was at a big wedding tonight--500 people, very fancy and great, loud live music, dancing, food and drink galore and flowers from the Garden of Eden....yet while the bride's father was giving a brief speech, a toast, most folks went on talking and talking--ignoring and disrespecting him, making it hard for others to hear. Yet right next to me, three people at a table of ten were busily typing and pressing buttons on their cellphones. People were on cellphonex sending text and talking all over the reception. A few years ago, at the wedding of the bride's sister, a guy next to me was busy making cellphone calls in the middle of the wedding ceremony!!! I asked him to please stop or to continue with it outside, as it was disrespectful to the wedding, was distracting me and disrupted the event. He threatened to physically harm me! A wedding guest to another!

What about busy, busy, busy people who cannot even return a phone call or answer an email?--and when it is so cheap and so easy!

I used to call a friend to meet for breakfast or lunch. He was a busy professor--always too busy, but he has since retired and guess what? He's still too busy. But we manage to get together--and have a great, rollicking conversation about all kinds of stuff, but it's always me who initiates the call. He has never returned a call without a delay of two or three weeks--and sometimes never returns them.

About two weeks ago I tried for one last time, and called him, and same thing. No reply. I happened to see him the other day at a store. He launched right into an apology about how I was on his list but he was so busy, he had a hard month etc., etc....and I am sure he did. But so what? I asked him if he knew the story of the boy who cried wolf. I said how disappointing it was and while I understood how busy he can be, I cannot figure out what is the problem. He can't return a phone call or send an email?

I'm gonna call him to apologize. I was a bit heavy handed, but I really was disappointed. It has happened many times before. What am I--a masochist?

My philosophy about all of this is simple: The more electronic devices a person has and the more time a person spends on those devices, the less actual communication takes place between people. Maybe I'll call if Foer's Reverse Correlation Law of Diminishing Communication. Hmm... too complicated. I'll work on another one.

Another example--a very busy and self-important neighbor with a lot of money drives, er speeds, his fancy black, Land Rover down my street from his fancy, white, waterfront home with the sprawling green lawn on the way to his office or wherever...making phone calls on his "Blue Tooth". As he is busy doing this, perhaps talking to some business partner in China, he speeds by the corner where my son and a few other children wait for their bus--and I believe his speeding was endangering them, and everyone else. You see, in his very busy world, he has to be in touch with people around the globe, and he has to do it while driving, but paying attention to children in his neighborhood is not as important.

I called him about it, and of course he answered via his "Blue Tooth" (which I had never even heard of--reminds me of Lt. Uhuru on The Enterprise--open a hailing frequency...) while he is on the train to New York. To his credit, he listened and was considerate and apologized. I think he meant it, but.... "I guess I was talking on my Blue Tooth and wasn't paying attention" he told me. Well-duh, yeah that's the problem my friend. Shut up and drive I am thinking, but I don't say it! So, just the other day, I see him doing the same thing again--speeding down my street, past the school bus stop and rolling past the stop sign in his fancy Land Rover. End of story? I dunno. I hope it does not have a sad ending.

So, it's a must do in the middle of a wedding, in the middle of driving, and we all get connected and hooked up and linked up and networked.....but we miss hearing the father toast the bride, fail to watch out for children waiting for their bus and fail our friends who don't want a mediated conversation.

Why it's nothing less than the downfall of civilization.

There you have it--perhaps I've told you more than you cared to hear. I just prefer to be, cellibate, you might call it.

City Budget/War Budget: Ironic, or Just Interesting?

Okay. I'll say it again. I have consistently opposed the debacle in Iraq and yes, in dollars alone, it is costing us all...everyday. So I salute Alderman Shropshire and others for putting on a town hall about the local costs of the war thousands of miles away. However, Alderman Shropshire often gets involved in a lot of "bigger" issues and he seems to lose focus on really local concerns where his vote does count. I posted about this in May when the vote came up in City Council about postponing the final vote to approve our new budget or not. That,as you will recall, was defeated. Shropshire was on the losing end of that vote along with Mayor Moyer and Alderpersons Hole and Finlayson.

You with me? The four members of city council, all Democrats, wanted to quickly approve the budget in mid-May, even though the law gives us until the end of June. Five other members, including two Republicans, an Independent and Two Democrats voted to study it further. Seems reasonable to me. The mayor then comes out and whines that it was a partisan thing! Right. As if she is not the most partisan thing around herself. But here is the catch--according to The Capital, at the town hall meeting on the effect of the war in Iraq, guess which were the four council members who attended?
So, I ask, is it ironic or is it just interesting? See The Capital at: www.hometownannapolis.com/cgi-bin/read/2008/06_01-41/CAN

blogger templates | Make Money Online