Campaign Ratings have been April 15, May 1, May 15 and June 1, June 24 and today, July 31.
A means candidate is ready to be mayor
B means candidate really wants to be mayor
C means candidate wants to be mayor but we'd like to see more conviction
D means if you want a decisive person in office, you'll probably have to find someone else.
When I began this, in order to get an A, the candidate had to have filed with the city clerk, made a public announcement, have an active campaign and active web-site. It has become gradually harder to maintain high ratings as the campaigns progressed and I consider overall activity, public presence, visibility, involvement with issues and how they are communicating about the issues to the public and media. These grades reflect my candid observations of the campaigns and not their positions on issues. I regularly ask each candidate for updates. Some respond quickly with details. Others are less forthcoming. Updates this time in this sort of yellowish color (Does this make this yellow journalism??).
Summary for each candidate starting with first and last two ratings (I, R and D are self explanatory...I hope):
(I) Fox Began with B Minus, Upgraded from B to A
(R) Cordle Began with A Minus, Downgraded from B to C
(R) Flyntz Began with C, Downgraded from C Minus to D (withdrawn)
(D) Cohen Began with B,Upgraded from B to A
(D) Shropshire Began with B, Now maintained at C
(D) McFall Began with A, Holding Steady with an A
(D) Pierre Began with C, Upgraded from A Minus to A
(D) Taylor Began with C, Holding Steady at D
(D) Renaut Began with C, Maintained at C
(D) Sears-Deppa Began with C (just entered race)
Overall review:
A --Fox, Cohen, McFall, Pierre
C--Shropshire, Renaut, Sears-Deppa, Cordle
D Flyntz, Taylor
In August, we'll review the campaign finance reports and of course, for the Dems, things should really be picking up for the primary. In a related matter, as part of my series on profiling the candidates for my "The Ninth Ward" column in The Capital, I asked each of the Democrats to quickly respond to set up an interview time. Only Trudy McFall has replied so far (Pierre and Cohen were already profiled)....Gil? Wayne? Laurie? Sam?
This time we start with The Independent:
Chris Fox, detailed but not recently active web-site, collecting signatures to be on ballot Rating on April 15th B minus Fox has been at Sip N' Blogs, at other events and people are beginning to talk about his candidacy with some seriousness but he hardly got any votes on our online poll. If it were not for his frankness and seriousness as demonstrated to me and through his web-site, I would not know how else to grade him, but I am waiting until we see some more sustained and public activity. He did attend Scott Bowling's kickoff and he plans an official announcement in a week so this grade may improve quickly. Upgrade to B NEW: Fox was a guest at Sip N' Blog and has been attending regularly. He had good crowds at both his official announcement and a fund-raiser. He continues to gather signatures to be placed on the ballot and has done some upgrades to his web-site. I've seen some signs up and Fox did attend the Ward One Resident's Association meeting. Upgraded to B Plus. Fox regularly attends Sip N' Blogs, has hosted or is about to host a series of fund-raisers, has beefed up his web-site and advertising and he and his campaign manager Devin Heritage attend city council meetings. I have seen more of his signs around town. Maintained at B Plus. He has organized and attended events, and continues to collect signatures to place him on the ballot, though I believe it is an unfair disadvantage to Independents.
From campaign manager Devin Heritage:
-Fundraisers at Fado, Castlebay and Dock Street in the last 2 weeks.
-Meet and greet in Eastport on 6-14
-Attended the President's Hill Residents Association Summer Picnic on 6/13.
-Made major pushes for signatures in Wards 3, 4, 5 and 7 in the last 2 weeks.
-Hope to make pushes in 3, 7 and 8 this week and weekend.
-All plans indicate that we would like to have the petition to get Chris on the ballot completed before July 1st. At that time we will officially file with the city.
-Planned meet and greet with downtown business owners July 7th at Slyfox to discuss the forthcoming elections and its implications on local businesses.
- Plan to have a presence at the Irish Festival on MD Ave in June
- Plan to have a part in the 4th of July parade
Rating maintained at B Plus, mainly in keeping with my own standards, which require filing to receive an A, although I understand this is likely due to him being an independent and needing all the signatures to actually get on the ballot--a distinct and unfair disadvantage.
With getting on the general ballot, Fox got a big boost and showed he is not only viable but organized and assertive. He continues to be visible, assertive and shows energy and enthusiasm. I think his campaign deserves the grade of A.
Dave Cordle, announced, actively campaigning, papers filed, active web-site Rating on April 15 A minus (has not knocked on my door yet) UPDATE: How come no activity on web-site for two months? Did attend Scott Bowling's kickoff. Where is the public outreach? The man is a busy alderman and has a full-time job, but how about some news or web activity? Rating Today downgraded to B. Some supporters held a fund-raiser for him, but it was not even promoted on his web-site, which has not been upgraded in months. Two different sources told me that 15 people came. These same supporters sent out an email invitation attacking Democrats. I give the candidate leeway because he is a hardworking alderman and has a full-time job but sooner or later, this presumed Republican front-runner must start campaigning as if he will be getting the Republican nomination. No activity on his web-site for months. However, he does attend some Sip N' Blogs and has told me that more campaign activity is planned or is soon to be underway. Rating downgraded to B Minus, but again with the above conditions in mind. He's busy doing his aldermanic duties and I suspect he is working a lot behind the scenes. His web-site has not been modified since he announced in February. Rating maintained at B-Minus. I Received this from Steven Crim of The Cordle Campaign: Last month, we had several small events where we listened to the concerns of many residents about the direction our city is heading. We look forward to more of these events as we expand our support network.
The campaign has begun to turn a corner and we have stepped up our efforts to reach out and listen to voters in every ward. This month we will:
Participate in Eastport-A-Rockin' and the Fourth of July parade;
Begin meeting voters on the doorsteps to listen to their concerns;
Launch our new web site; and,
Open our campaign headquarters.
Frank Flyntz, originally announced at a party that a few people knew about in June, 2008 but then did another announcement party earlier this year but information was never placed on his own web-site nor shared with the media as far as I could tell. Rating on April 15th C (inactive web-site, inactive campaign, not filed) UPDATE again because he did not adequately announce his announcement, we cannot find a phone number or email for him and he only got three votes on the online poll. I have not seen any sign of campaign activity nor is he known to have a treasurer, which is a must for raising money. Downgraded to C minus May 15 I have tried to get information from the candidate but he is apparently not interested because I had to repeatedly leave messages for him by phone and on his door. When I finally contacted him, he told me that he does have a treasurer (not posted on his web-site) although he has not yet provided me with his campaign literature despite two such requests. He will be the last of the nine mayoral candidates to be a guest at Sip N' Blog and this only came about two days ago when he agreed to attend on May 28. He is supposedly speaking at the Republican Wednesday breakfast group. I asked him to email this information but have not received it, and until I do, I don't even know his e-mail. Flyntz is remarkably laid back and nonchalant and does not seem to appreciate my earnest attempts to communicate with him or to promote his campaign as I am doing for all candidates. My own standards forced me to upgrade him to C because at least he has filed, but if this campaign does not show some seriousness soon, this barely deserved C will be even harder to maintain because his behavior and attitude is that of a person who is trying hard to go nowhere really quickly. Flyntz changed his mind about attending Sip N' Blog saying it would not be to his benefit, so we had Alderman Israel in his place. Flyntz drew a small crowd at a recent Republican breakfast, made a couple tiny updates to his web-site and created a brochure almost completely based on his web-site--neither of which list his campaign treasurer. He is running against a well-known and connected native Annapolitan and alderman, which makes me wonder why he is not working harder to build name recognition. Did not provide an update. Maintained at C. Has anyone heard or seen from Flyntz? His web-site has no updates--again and his treasurer is still not listed. He did not respond to my request for information about his campaign. I am downgrading this campaign to C Minus....barely deserved.... I am trying to write something nice. but there is just no visible activity except for the way-too visible pickup truck parked in his driveway with the big signs. If this campaign were a medical patient, I'd be calling the clergyman. He chose not to participate in the HACA forum or CP's mayoral debate. He continues to flaunt city code which requires his material to display an authority and treasurer line yet he removed his big, ugly signs posted on the truck in his driveway. I have to downgrade this campaign to a D.
FLYNTZ WITHDREW IN LATE JULY WITHOUT ANY APPARENT PUBLIC EXPLANATION
Democrats
Josh Cohen, announced, actively campaigning, active web-site Rating on April 15th B He has not yet filed but he is out in the public eye, was a guest at Sip N' Blog, did not gather many votes on CP's online poll, and he is about to open an office. Once he files, he will likely move to an A if he remains active. Rating Today remains at B. He has opened an office, is out in public and I even see some bumper-stickers for him around town. I don't know why he has not filed. His campaign says he is knocking on doors but no details were provided as requested. As with Dave Cordle, he too holds elected office and a full-time job so I give him that benefit. Maintained at B. Cohen is quite busy as a county councilman and budget season has just concluded. He is racking up endorsements and is speaking at another Democratic breakfast. I suspect a lot is going on behind the scenes. For being what many consider to be the presumptive front-runner, I am not seeing much activity and his campaign has not answered requests for updates. Will hold at B for now but we must ask, why has he not yet filed? He has finally filed as a candidate. I expected that filing would have been more of a priority than racking up endorsements for an elected official with this much campaign experience, with staff and an office. He is making some public appearances and I have spotted some of his bumper stickers. I will maintain him at B mainly because when I asked for a bullet list of campaign activity updates, I received a puff-piece extolling the virtues of the candidate and the campaign but no updates of substance upon which to make a determination. With an office and paid staff, one expects better. However, I provide it here in its entirety as written by campaign manager Kathy Nieberding and readers can make their own judgments:
Sam Shropshire, announced, actively campaigning, active web-site Rating on April 15th B (has not filed) . He still has not filed, but he is making the rounds and remains in the public eye. I have to downgrade him for not responding to repeated inquiries as to whether he supported putting the city manager petition on the city's website. Rating today down to B minus. He has some web updates and public activity including his ill-advised charter amendment to push the elections back which he quickly withdrew. He has posted a paper about this on his site. Has some events planned. Rating maintained at B minus. Recipient of much recent publicity, albeit unwanted, Shropshire appears to be maintaining a low profile and his original manager Lee Caudle has resigned. Did not reply for requests to update. Rating maintained at B minus and he has not filed. He seems to have become mighty quiet lately and there are no updates at his web-site or events scheduled. He has not filed as a candidate nor has he replied to any communication and I downgrade him to a C.
He waited until the last minute to file and left the City Council meeting to do so, which is cause for concern but he said it was because Jesus had said the last will be first. He was out of touch due to a series of cyber-mishaps and loss of data and ability to communicate. There has been no recent activity on his web-site and although he has maintained some presence, his campaign has faltered and lost steam. In any event, I maintain him at C because he is plugging away..
Trudy McFall, announced, actively campaigning, papers filed, active web-site Rating on April 15th A. I would like to see more activity on web-site, but she did get the most votes on CP's online poll and remains active on issues and testifies at city council. Rating Today A. McFall remains actively involved in issues and legislation and testifies at City Council, attended budget hearings, as did her campaign manager Dennis Conti, also a regular at Sip N' Blog. Conti told CP "I can say that Trudy is continuing to door-knock every single Saturday and Sunday and will continue to do so through the elections. I can also say that she has personally door-knocked on over half the Democratic voters in the City." This is the only campaign to provide a specific update on this as requested. McFall was at the recent Ward One meeting as well. I maintain this campaign's rating at A. McFall spoke out on the budget and remains active with city issues along with her campaign manager Dennis Conti who reports, "As of last weekend, she personally completed walking 5 of the 8 wards and has been on a pace of a ward a month". Maintained at A because she is continuing her consistent momentum from early on. As I have come to expect, this candidate responds first and with the most complete answers to my request for campaign updates. I received the following from campaign manager Dennis Conti:
1. Trudy has testified at City Council on the budget and has attended a number of community association meetings and get togethers.
2. She continues to door-knock every weekend and meet voters one-on-one.
3. Trudy has attended a number of meet-and-greets hosted by local residents.
4. Trudy's web site, http://www.trudymcfall.com/ has been updated with the following (see Breaking News on her home page): Trudy's Letter to the Editor on the City Budget, her response to interview questions, and an overview of her efforts helping Annapolitans with housing. Regarding filing status, Trudy filed a political committee on August 30, 2007 so that she could begin to raise and spend money, as required by City Code. On January 13, 2009 she filed for candidacy for Mayor. Maintained at A.
McFall has demonstrated great staying power and has posted signs all over town, sent out mailers, knocked on doors and more than any other candidate has consistently remained active and visible in a host of city legislative issues. Her campaign is maintained at A.
Zina Pierre, announced, active campaign and web-site Rating on April 15th C Has not yet filed but her announcement was well organized and attended and she got a close second place finish on CP's online poll. Plenty of campaign material but still not much writing of substance or positions on issues. Still not well known outside of core support group but is showing momentum. Was guest at Sip N Blog. Rating Today Upgraded to B. She has been coming to Sip N' Blogs, City Council meetings, has been updating her web-site, has sent out news releases, and has some events planned. She spoke to the Ward One Resident's Association. The campaign has shown great energy in the last few weeks and it looks as if this momentum will continue. I'll upgrade her to an A. Pierre has put on some events, attends city council meeting, other events and has an active web-site. She writes, "We have been door knocking for the past month and a half, however we have put flyers in various communities for the past two months. To date, we have been in parts of Wards 1, 2, 3, 4, 8. Because these are such large wards, we will finish knocking doors in 5, 6, and 7 first and then repeat all of them as we continue. In between walks I am touring different parts of the city with residents sharing their concerns in various communities and we are steadily continuing our community conversations in the homes of interested voters." I'll maintain her at A. Zina has had some events and appearances and normally responds to communications but not in this instance. The energy which her campaign began with has seems to stall a bit. Downgraded to A Minus. Pierre has shown renewed energy and drive and has held gatherings where voters can meet her face-to-face. She has walked in my n'hood and passed out campaign literature and many signs are appearing. Her campaign is upgraded back to an A.
Wayne Taylor, announced, actively campaigning, inactive web-site Rating on April 15th C His web-site is still a big nothing, he has held some public meetings and knocked on doors. Where's his literature? Upgrade to C plus this time because he's making the rounds with public meetings. Where is Wayne? I have not heard a word and he has not answered email. His web-site is still a big nothing. He has not yet filed. Downgraded to D. He held a fund-raiser on a boat last night but I have not received a report. His web-site remains a big nothing--a big, outdated nothing at this point which did not even promote his fund-raiser. He did appear at a Democratic breakfast. It's very hard to find his stand on issues or his record as an alderman. Moved up to C Minus because there are at least some signs of life. He has not yet filed nor did he provided an update despite two personal email requests. Wayne has had little activity, no updates to his web-site, and has not provided any information nor has he filed although he indicated to me that he is finally getting a web-site up. That web-site is now up and it is a slight improvement over the original disaster. Similar to his earlier site, there is a big picture of the candidate looking very serious with an American flag draped in the background, but the stars on the right and the bars are on the left (?). There remains little if anything of substance on this site and I cannot understand why he seems to have such trouble providing information about himself or articulating his positions. He has not yet filed. I have to downgrade this campaign to a D.
As with Flyntz, I wish I could say something positive but Taylor just does not appear to be making an impact at any level. His fetid web-site still includes his "Five Points of Life" a vague collection of almost imperceptible ramblings that seem to suggest more government involvement in every aspect of life and more government funding of social programs. He has clothing for sale with his photo but where is the beef? Plus, the police raid on the storefront which supposedly also housed his campaign headquarters and was owned by his campaign manager did not help. He sent an email blast and none of the links to his web-site were active. Did not attend CP's debate. Maintained at D.
Gil Renaut, I believe he has announced perhaps not with a public presence or kickoff party, but he has not filed, and his web-site is hardly active, so I'm gonna have to go with Rating of C on April 15th. Renaut got a respectable third on our online poll, he is seen at Sip N' Blog and was a guest but his web-site is still barely adequate and I don't see any literature. I'll upgrade him to a C plus/B minus. The candidate stays in touch with CP, attends Sip N' Blogs but I see little evidence of an active campaign or web-site, although he is making some public appearances such as at the Ward One Resident's Association meeting where he said he is hiring professional staff. Maintained at C plus/B minus mainly because of lack of web-site activity. Renaut continues to attend Sip N' Blogs, city council meetings and made minor additions to his web-site. He has not yet filed nor did he provide an update. Maintained at C plus/B minus. The candidate says he has done some door knocking in his own ward and he posts some occasional thoughts on his web-site. He said he was hiring professionals but no word on that yet. He has finally filed so I maintain him at C plus/B minus, but we expect some more activity.
Renaut's campaign has yet to take off and the candidate gives the appearance of being hesitant or unsure about how to campaign. He created a brief video on his web-site, but it added nothing to our understanding of the candidate who seems not yet to have found his voice. He begins by saying "I want your vote" and speaks of the need for outreach but seems to be doing little actual outreach. He concludes by saying "I need your vote". However, he is appearing and speaking in public and seems to be doing better behind the microphone. I slightly downgrade the campaign to C.
Laurie Sears Deppa...Our newest candidate, recently switched from Republican to Democrat, enters a crowded field at the eleventh hour with virtually no name recognition. This would suggest either a very powerful if not brazen "devil may care" attitude at best...or at worst, something else entirely. She does have a web-site up but may have gotten more publicity through her appearance on a video doing a dance. She announced on a Tuesday afternoon at a downtown restaurant and she appeared articulate at the HACA forum but said she did not know about it until two hours before (??). She did not attend CP''s recent debate because she had to attend to family matters. At first I thought it would not be fair to grade this, as we did not have much to go on or a track record to review, but realized that's not anyone's fault but her own, so I'll give her a C because at least she made a web-site and appeared in public and of course, she has filed.
Please send comments, subscribe, share with your friends, and support our sponsors. Join us every Thursday morning from 8-9 am for our Sip N' Blogs held in local coffee shops...except for that one in Eastport we used to patronize...ahhhh choo!.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment